Since I became addicted to chains around the turn of the century I spent a great deal of time visiting watch forums and websites dedicated to see reviews. I picked up a great deal of useful, maybe expert-grade or correctly structured information along the way. 1 thing I found myself interested in were in-depth comparisons of watch A vs. watch B. This isn’t to say that standalone watch reviews do not have their merits or place. They certainly offer a great deal of helpful info and quite good live images of new versions, providing potential buyers with generally impartial opinions. The reason I find comparisons more intriguing is that if you’re interested in a watch, chances are you already might have a similarly priced/specified version from a different manufacturer, thus bringing the info on the other watch in a more meaningful context. So I chose to utilize my true modest knowledge to provide you such comparison, in the event you care to see it.
Watch Shootout: IWC Ingenieur 40mm 3239 vs. Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 8500 So, why the Aqua Terra? Well, to start with, these watches come from manufacturers with roughly the same pedigree and both are part of a larger collection: Richemont for IWC and Swatch for Omega. Secondly, these watches were both created and are indeed perceived as go-anywhere, do-anything watches, and also frequently referred to as beach-to-boardroom. Third, their MSRPs are in the exact same ballpark, with the IWC possibly 15% more expensive. Fourth, they’re also rather similar in size. The IWC ingenieur vintage replica watch has a 1.5mm smaller measured diameter, but it also has crown guardsthat make the wrist existence nearly identical. That is except for the depth, but more on this later. The specific AT in this contrast is the Captain’s Watch. It should have been the conventional white dial version, but I currently don’t own one of these. I will not, as others , give grades into the different areas of these watches as cumulated scores might have some indicative price, but everyone’s weighting of these aspects is different, so even if someone were to agree with my assessments, their final score may be quite distinct. I’ll, however, declare a winner under each heading, however presumptuous that may seem — for both your benefit and my pleasure.
Honestly, I only included this heading because most of in depth watch reviews start with the packaging and I didn’t want to short-change you, Dear Reader. I have little to say besides both packages are up to their various companies’ criteria for their cheap(er), non-limited variations. They serve their function in providing ample protection during shipping and offer a measure of presentation while at the home. Imitation leather for Omega and synthetic-coated wood for IWC ingenieur dual time replica watch, but IWC’s box is a bit more classy and feels more durable, but I presume that under heavy stress none would perform considerably better than the other. You receive the compulsory booklets and warranty card, but no COSC chronometer certificate. Omega only provides one on petition, while IWC’s own superior standards exceed those of the august Contrôle Officiel Suisse des Chronomètres, hence they have not a single formally certified chronometer as well as fewer reluctantly Certified Superlative Chronometers, anything”superlative” could mean. Sorry, I just could not resist the temptation.
The crown is generously sized, signed with the Omega emblem and halfway polished to the case, acting as a crown guard of sorts. The screwed-in crown is the only other thing where the two watch cases are nearly identical: both are ideally sized, perfectly grooved for grip but without harsh borders and both provide both smooth and crisp functionality with just the right amount of tactile feedback. The IWC ingenieur history imitation watch instance is a much more Spartan affair, with a clear dominance of brushed surfaces, emphasizing the instrument watch nature of the Ingenieur. The crystal is flat, with an equally good — or perhaps a bit better — anti-reflective coating.
The case back is the standard steel difficulty familiar from past Ingenieur models. Funnily enough for a line that began life together and became known for being highly anti-magnetic, this is the only version in the new lineup which has that property. The crown guard is a welcome addition as previous versions had rather clearly protruding crowns, which made them more vulnerable (though I have not seen any anecdotal evidence of the actually causing any issues ). The case is especially slimmer (see MEASURABLE DATA) than the Omega: if you are wearing anything with long sleeves, then you’ll always be advised that you are wearing a watch. By comparison, the Ingenieur gets the capability to disappear until the time when you truly want or wish to utilize it. And that Is Most Likely the main reason why
Both dials are white, though Omega calls theirs”opaline silver”. Bulgari and Cartier are two other culprits who do exactly the same, but for me they’re all white. The difference is that Omega’s indices are shaped, rhyming with the arrowhead of the minute hand. The flip side, however, has its head missing which requires some getting used to, but it is not the sole Omega thus configured. I suppose Omega considers this portion of their legacy. It will surely set aside the AT’s looks, as does the vertically grooved teak dial, which may look dramatically different depending on the angle of the incident light. My only gripe with this dial is the abundance of text — six lines, if you count the Omega emblem. It surely is an intriguing dialup, and I often find myself looking at the dial up for no fantastic reason apart from its attractiveness.
IWC went for a far more austere — some may even say boring — seem, using square hour mark and fencing post palms, together with the indices and the palms polished to an impeccable mirror finish. The quantity of text on the dial is precisely exactly what it should be: producer and hometown at 12 o’clock and model at 6. I am at the camp which says the less writing on the dial the better (e.g. Patek Philippe — Geneve) but in this instance you can not ask IWC to just drop the identifying INGENIEUR intersected with a lightning bolt (reference its anti-magnetic possessions ). After all, it has been around since the first IWC Ingenieur replica watch launched in 1955. The most important facet under this heading must be legibility. In that, both watches are all about as great you can get. The IWC hands throw off light to achieve this, while the shiny navy blue palms of the Omega ensure comparison with the dial nicely into dusk. Luminosity is weak to unsatisfactory in both cases. After about one hour in the dark, both are almost useless. The Ingenieur’s green lume is all but gonewhile Omega outright mocks you with all the blue lume still clearly visible on the hour markers but none left over the hands.
Even though it retained the five holes at the bezel for a design cue, they no longer served any purpose: Genta’s Ingenieur needed a screwed-in bezel, hence the need for the holes. The angular crown guards add yet another element of sharpness. Having said all that, the general type of this watch, regardless of how much or how small, in fact, it looks like the Ingenieur SL, has a coherent language, more angular but nevertheless restrained sophistication and borrows the Germanic no-nonsense functionality for which IWC’s finest, post-quartz-crisis era versions are famous for.
The Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra also builds on various design elements borrowed from Omegas of all yore, adding some fresh ones like the perpendicular grooves of the dial and the trapezoidal window. I am not saying that these elements don’t work well together, it is just that the watch — particularly compared with the Ingenieur — gives the impression of something put together with a design committee that was tasked to make a crowd-pleaser that is a dress, sports and dive watch rolled into one. To Omega’s charge, they did really reach their goal. While I don’t have production amounts available, I think it’s at least their next most common current model after the Planet Ocean, if not the most popular one.
I am not a watchmaker, so my view here is simply an educated consumer’s perspective. The Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra has now, tried-and-tested 8500 motion. It boasts a significantly longer energy book (see table above), which means that in the event that you set the watch down Friday evening, then it will still be ticking come Monday morning. The Ingenieur has quite a capable and powerful ETA 2892-A2 motion, which has the decided advantage that any competent watchmaker would probably have the ability to take action for much less than what an Omega-certified service centre could charge for the 8500. It’s, as far as I know, reworked by IWC, but I had no way to determine details, nor will IWC ingenieur amg imitation watch show how extensive that job is. Concerning out-of-the-box accuracy, IWC has an excellent track record, but in the last decade or so Omega has overall pretty much caught up with them and numerous anecdotal evidence and my personal experience indicates that their 8500 motion has outstanding long-term equilibrium.
Keep in mind though that we are probably splitting hairs here, the gap in long-term accuracy being maybe a few moments better for Omega, given that both moves are properly regulated. The Omega also has the convenience of a independently settable hour , making time zone adjustments easier, at the reduction of this quick-set date. Ultimately, we return to the thorny issue of in-house versus outsourced movements. Whatever your own opinion could be, it is a simple fact that IWC ingenieur blue dial fake watch does not have an in-house movement that would fit in the Ingenieur’s rather slim case. Then again, Omega’s 8500 motion wouldn’t fit into a reasonably water resistant and otherwise robust 10mm situation either.
On the OEM bracelets, the two watches reveal the same quantity of versatility, with the Ingenieur a bit more capable towards the dressy end of this spectrum, mainly because of its slimmer profile. The black dial version not discussed here will cover the same spectrum, shifted a tiny bit towards formal. The Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra, due to its bolder design has a small advantage in the sporty end of the spectrum. But when you begin considering other straps/bracelets, the picture does change quite significantly. IWC has the notable advantage of its own proprietary bracelet quick-change system*, making the change painless and easy with just a set of toothpicks. IWC does include two brass pins for this purpose, but that I just use toothpicks — they are always available and make the entire thing much more enjoyable. However, this very system ensures that the owner is restricted to the strap choices supplied by the manufacturer. It would be wonderful to have the selection of one canvas/kevlar and a single leather strap. The Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra has a typical lug diameter of 20mm and a huge selection of OEM straps and bracelets, be it for this particular version or other Omega models. And there are of course the almost endless choices offered by third party strap/bracelet manufacturers.
In econometrics you will find at least five known and accepted methods to measure brand value, with varying levels of acceptance and accuracy. Breaking that down to person watch versions is likely both difficult to attain and somewhat futile. As far as brand recognition goes, the average man is far more likely to have heard of Omega than IWC. On the flip side, watch enthusiast arguably picturing IWC as having a slightly higher position among the overall set of luxury watches. IWC is also more exclusive for two reasons. First of all, Omega makes ten times as many watches than IWC — 750,000 units in 2012 against 75,000* — and secondly, IWC is a mens’ just watch brand. Whether this second point is a plus or a minus, is dependent on your emancipation degree and your courage to publicly admit controversial preferences. For me it’s a plus, and that I’ve simultaneously lost most subscribers of the fairer gender and submitted myself to terminal public stoning. To the extent that search popularity** isn’t any indication, Omega’s Seamaster line is second only to the Rolex Submariner, although the highest-ranked IWC line is the Pilot, set up 14. Even though the MSRP gap is only about 15% in favor of Omega, their authorized dealers often offer more generous reductions. Additionally, Omega offers a four-year warranty on all watches with the 8500 movement against IWC’s 2 decades. In terms of resale value, IWCs tend to perform much better, but that fluctuates a lot depending on the specific model. And there’s of course the previously discussed issue of in house versus generic movement, where Omega has the clear benefit. After all,
However,… Yes, there’s always a but, is not there? At any particular time, my view collection contains six to ten pieces, with a clear preference for sporty steel watches. Once a year at the annual State of the Collection navel-gazing — or sometimes more than once a year, depending on how fast my collection changes — I play with a tiny solitary game of culling, deciding which watches could proceed and in what order when I wanted or could be made to downsize. If the two remaining ones are the Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 8500 and the IWC Ingenieur, the subjective choice would be the Ingenieur, on account of its design, wearability, versatility and overall appeal.